What does result mean in a science project

The results are simply the end of the scientific experiment: What you found in your study. In the hardcore world of science, results are often incomplete without statistics.

Statistics not only help show that the results are objectively -- as opposed to subjectively -- important, but they also help scientists test their hypotheses. Some statisticians would even say that the results are statistics.

Indeed, no science is perfect, but statistics allow a scientist to show how close to perfect she can get. Having obtained a Master of Science in psychology in East Asia, Damon Verial has been applying his knowledge to related topics since Having written professionally since , he has been featured in financial publications such as SafeHaven and the McMillian Portfolio.

He also runs a financial newsletter at Stock Barometer. A simple example of the scientific method is: Ask a Question: Why does Greenland look so large on a map? Also learn that Mercator projection maps are made by transferring the images from a sphere to a sheet of paper wrapped around the sphere in a cylinder.

Hypothesis: If I make a Mercator projection map, then the items in the middle of the map will look their true size and the items at the poles will look larger than they really are.

Experiment: Use a sphere with 1-inch by 1-inch squares at each pole and the equator to make a Mercator projection map. Measure the squares on the Mercator projection map. Analyze Data and Make Conclusions: The middle-of-the-map squares average 1 inch per side while the squares at the poles average 3 inches per side.

In conclusion, the projection process used to make Mercator projection maps creates distortion at the poles, but not at the equator. This is why Greenland, which is close to the North Pole, looks larger than it is. Communicate: Make a video, write a report, or give a presentation to educate others about the experiment. The scientific method was not invented by any one person, but is the outcome of centuries of debate about how best to find out how the natural world works.

The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle was among the first known people to promote that observation and reasoning must be applied to figure out how nature works. The Arab Muslim mathematician and scientist Hasan Ibn al-Haytham known in the western world as Alhazen is often cited as the first person to write about the importance of experimentation.

Since then, a large number of scientists have written about how science should ideally be conducted and contributed to our modern understanding of the scientific method. Scientists today continue to evolve and refine the scientific method as they explore new techniques and new areas of science. Scientists do use the scientific method, but not always exactly as laid out in the organized steps taught in the classroom.

Just like a chef might make a few changes to a recipe because of the ingredients at hand, a scientist may modify the scientific method by skipping steps, jumping back and forth between steps, or repeating a subset of the steps because he or she is dealing with imperfect real-world conditions.

But scientists always strive to keep to the core principles of the scientific method by using observations, experiments, and data to support or reject explanations of how a phenomenon works. If you think you need additional experimentation, describe what you think should happen next. Scientific research is an ongoing process, and by discovering that your hypothesis is not true, you have already made huge advances in your learning that will lead you to ask more questions that lead to new experiments.

Science fair judges do not care about whether you prove or disprove your hypothesis; they care how much you learned. Here are sample conclusions. Menu Science Projects. Project Guides. View Site Map. Science Projects. After all the data is organized in a form that relates it to your hypothesis, you can interpret it and reach a conclusion about the experiment.

The conclusion is simply a report about what you learned based on whether the results agree or disagree with your hypothesis. It usually contains a summary of the actual procedure and makes note of anything unexpected that happened during the experiment.

Your conclusion should consider all possible explanations of the data, including any errors you might have made, such as forgetting to water the plants one day. It can also give you a point from which to create further hypotheses relating to the experiment. You have learned that your hypothesis does not answer your original research question.